![]() |
| Turner's Launceston, Cornwall (1827) |
Sublime art is all based around mankind's seeming insignificance in the world outside of its cities and homes. It awes, disturbs, and enlightens us all at once.
Then there is the toxic sublime, embodied in the work of Edward Burtynsky. He's a photographer from Ontario, who's work showcases the destruction and interruption of the natural environment, as seen through strip mines, junkyards, and vast oil spills.
Like traditional notions of the sublime, Burtynsky's work focuses on the interaction between humanity and its environment, It makes great use of contrasts and images of titanic immensity.
However, the biggest different between toxic sublime and its parent is that the landscapes featured are the result of human hands and human ambitions.
In the words of Peeples (2011): "in contrast to the sublime in nature, which functions to improve moral character...the horror of the toxic sublime calls to question the personal, social and environmental ethics that allows these places of contamination to exist."
![]() |
| From Burtynsky's Manufactured Landscapes (2006) |
Toxic Sublime offers an interesting spin on an established art concept, while also giving its viewers a message. Clearly, we are not meant to fear nature, as in earlier examples. No, here we are meant to fear FOR nature.


No comments:
Post a Comment